
(Overview)Graaft sells AI people. Its site had to prove one could feel real without reading as though an AI had written it. I designed, built and wrote it.
- Client
- Graaft
- Sector
- AI products
- Year
- 2026
- Role
- Design and build
- Scale
- 13 pages · 76 entries
- Status
- Live · measuring
The colours, off the site
- PaperGround#F2EBDA
- WordsInk#1A1410
- EmphasisAccent#C0612A
- Second voiceMuted#6B5F54
Type
We build AI people. Made present.
We sell AI people, so the site selling them could not read like an AI wrote it.
Every category has a smell now and ours is the worst of them. Pages of confident, frictionless copy that says nothing and could belong to anybody. A studio selling AI cannot afford one line of it, because the site is the first thing a buyer meets and the whole claim is that we make this stuff feel like a person. The promise is six words, "we build AI people, made present", and a reader decides whether to believe it in about a second. So the site is not a brochure for the work. It is the work, and the first one anybody sees.
What I built to hold it together is one shape: every AI worker, every person on the team and every project answers the same short set of questions, in the same order, from one file. That is why thirteen pages sound like one studio instead of thirteen.
The studio is built the way it builds for others, and the site says so out loud rather than hiding it: two founders and sixteen AI specialists, with the sixteen doing the specialist work and the two holding the standard. That is a structure most people would keep quiet about, and putting it on the About page was my call. A reader who catches you hiding the small thing stops believing the large one, so the awkward structure goes on the page. That is the habit I would bring to somebody else’s product, and it is worth more than any single screen in this study: I would rather lose a claim than keep one I cannot stand behind.

I did not design a system and then fill it. I designed pages, and kept the parts that earned a second use.
Fifty components came out of that, every one drawn for this site and not one taken from a library. A component exists here because the design needed it a second time, which is backwards to how design systems are usually taught and is exactly why there is nothing in this one that nobody uses.
The ones that did not work were scrapped immediately and kept as scaffolding, so a component that failed usually became part of the one that replaced it. Nothing here was carried because it had already been built.
That is the part that transfers. Most systems are specified up front and end up half unused, because somebody guessed at what would be needed. This one grew at the speed the design actually asked for, which is why it is smaller than it would otherwise be and why every piece of it is load-bearing. I would work the same way on somebody else’s product: draw it, use it twice, and only then does it become a component.

Thirteen pages and seventy-six entries, running on one content model and fifty components.
Live on graaft.ai, and it is the first thing anyone who might hire the studio meets. Seventy-six written entries and 1,216 separate changes, from one pair of hands. What makes that a design result rather than a build is that it holds one voice at that volume, with no page inventing its own way of describing things. Adding the next one is filling in a shape rather than designing a new page, which is the test the system was built to pass.
The part I would want judged is not the volume. It is that nothing on it claims more than it can hold. Whether it reaches anybody is not measured yet, and the studio built its own console to find out, which is the study next to this one.
- Of it, made by one person
- 100%
- AI specialists
- 16
- Components, one stylesheet
- 50
- Passes before a picture ships
- 6

I designed and built the entire site, and wrote every word on it.
What I did
- The content model behind it
- Fifty components, one stylesheet
- The rules about our own pictures
What the team did
- Dave, my co-founder, signs off
- The models we made them with
01 / 06
Use the left and right arrow keys to move through the images.
(The call)We say which pictures on this site we made with AI. And on every client project we say which ones we did not, because their photographers took those.
Nobody in this category discloses, and the reason is not mysterious: saying an image was generated invites the reader to trust it less. We took that hit on our own pages. The harder half was the second line, because on a site full of declared AI a client’s real photography reads as AI too unless somebody says otherwise, and that quietly takes the credit off the photographer who actually stood there.
Website









When every page was free to describe things its own way, the site drifted inside a fortnight. The shape is what holds the voice, not the writing.
Only I have ever written to that shape, so whether it holds when somebody else adds the next entry is a thing I believe rather than a thing I have tested.





